Portrait
Sustainable Cities and Communities
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Life on land
Responsible
consumption and production
Cities and Mobility
Building and Construction
Finance
Circular economy
Forest Management
Supply Chains
Agriculture and Nutrition
Governance
Sustainable Behaviour
Decarbonisation of the transport sector
Post-fossil cities
Co-evolution of business strategies and resource policies in the building industry
Ecological footprint in the housing sector
Financing clean tech
Sustainable finance
Laboratory for circular economy
Towards a sustainable circular economy
Challenges of modular water infrastructure systems
Resource efficiency in Swiss hospitals
Ecosystem services in forests
Trade‐offs in forests
Insurance value of forest ecosystems
Enhancing supply chain sustainability
Sustainable Public Procurement (SPP)
Open assessment of Swiss economy and society
Digital innovations for sustainable agriculture
Impacts of Swiss food consumption and trade
Interaction of economy and ecology in Swiss farms
Switzerland’s sustainability footprint
Sustainable Trade Relations for Diversified Food Systems
Green labour market effects
Voluntary corporate environmental initiatives
Legal framework for a resource-efficient circular economy
Nudging small and medium-sized companies
Rebound Effects of the Sharing Economy
Sustainable consumer behaviour
Extending the lifespan of mobile devices
The influence of environmental identities

Voluntary corporate environmental initiatives

This project examined policy options for democratic policymakers in the Global North (particularly Switzerland) with respect to ‘green’ economic initiatives and activity. Primarily, we focused on public opinion concerning the governance of private-sector contributions to sustainable economy transitions.

Background

Policymakers have many points of intervention and a large arsenal of policy tools at their disposal to reduce the environmental impacts of economic activity. However, how policymakers address the two following questions will likely shape their success. First, how may policymakers deal with the geographic diffusion of environmental impacts via trade and corporate supply chains? Second, to what extent may they restrict the activities of companies in the process to reduce environmental impacts

Aim

We studied the political feasibility of green economy policies aimed at various environmental problems caused by economic activity at every stage of a stylised product life cycle from the cradle (i.e. during production in lower-income countries) via trade to the grave (i.e. during final consumption or disposal). Using Switzerland as a ‘public opinion laboratory’, this project provided in-depth evidence on which levers policymakers (in Switzerland and hopefully elsewhere) may pull on their way to a sustainable economy.

Results

Environmental impacts of trade liberalisation

Our results indicate that trade liberalisation increases the aggregate environmental impacts of goods exported from low-income countries. The magnitude of this process interacts with countries’ political systems. That is, high-income and democratic countries are more likely to ‘off-load’ environmental impacts via trade.

 

Acceptance of private sector sustainability initiatives

The relevance of democratic institutions at the macro level corroborates our focus on public opinion at the micro level. In that respect, our results show that whether individuals (who are citizens and consumers) perceive the interplay between the private sector and the government as synergistic or not helps explain whether they are willing to support private-sector-led environmental policy initiatives. In the same vein, our results suggest that voluntary environmental action can benefit firms, as citizens are willing to reward it politically (e.g. softer regulatory enforcement).

 

Acceptance of political governance to increase sustainability

Notwithstanding support for political rewards, overall, citizens support robust government regulation of economic activity, namely in domestic environmental policy areas and the governance of global supply chains. There are several caveats, however. First, citizens are more tolerant towards lenient environmental regulation if it was set via an inclusive decision-making process. Second, our results reveal that, due to the multitude of involved actors and the complexity of the decision-making process, an inclusive policy process can reduce the accountability the public assigns to elected political representatives. Third, while we find that normative signals (e.g. by international organisations) can increase support for sustainable economy regulation, voluntary measures can decrease it if corporate actors commit to external audits and manage to maintain cooperation across sectors.

Implications for research

Our research has paved the way for further inquiry into how political institutions affect international environmental burden shifting at the macro level. At the micro level, our work points to avenues for future research on how citizens trade-off accountability and inclusiveness in environmental policy design. Finally, our most recent study spearheads research on public attitudes in the largest importing countries of the world towards international business and global supply chains.

Implications for practice

Due to the geographic separation of production and consumption, multi-pronged (e.g. both trade and supply chains-related) strategies will be necessary to reduce the negative environmental impacts of economic activity, and notably the global environmental impacts of local/domestic consumption. In that context, we suggest that the sustainability of global supply chains likely will continue to encroach on environmental and economic agendas in the political mainstream. Moreover, our findings indicate that policymakers could leverage public support to push for stronger oversight mandates in hybrid (public-private sector) domestic environmental governance.

Publications

Greenwashing and public demand for government regulation

Kolcava, D.
2022

Read now
Citizen preferences on private-public co-regulation in environmental governance: Evidence from Switzerland

Kolcava, D. et al.
2021

Read now
Greening the Economy through Voluntary Private Sector Initiatives or Government Regulation? A Public Opinion Perspective

Kolcava, D./Bernauer, T.
2021

Read now
Voluntary business initiatives can reduce public pressure for regulating firm behaviour abroad

Kolcava, D. et al.
2021

Read now
Do citizens provide political rewards to firms engaging in voluntary environmental action?

Kolcava, D. et al.
2021

Read now
Does trade liberalization lead to environmental burden shifting in the global economy?

Kolcava, D. et al.
2019

Read now

Project leaders​

Prof. Dr. Thomas Bernauer 
Institute of Science, Technology and Policy,
ETH Zürich

Viewpoint

Focus

Choose one or multiple of the above terms for highlighting the respective datasets on the Website.